Someone try this?
[Tactic] 4-1-2-3WB Full Att: tấn công và tấn công
Someone try this?
[Tactic] 4-1-2-3WB Full Att: tấn công và tấn công
Had a quick test of the FastPress and it seems really strong. My team is not that good and the tactic is not fluid and it was already out performing better teams. Anyone worked out the difference between the tactics?
Just use link provided by Pampu7 -> [16.2] [4-2-3-1] 2016 Fast&Press 평균어빌 140~150 쿼드러블 전술 ★다양한골장면★ V2, V3 버전 추가 - FM2016 전술자료실 - 에펨코리아
Link for tactic to download is on top of the page. If you cannot find it, just use CTRL+F and search for "Fastpress V3"![]()
Classic 442 by El Capone from Portuguese forum. Pred 11th. Champ 12 weeks before... Lots of goals. Great tactic.
[FM 2016] 4-4-2 Classico - Clube Manager Portugal (FM2016)
V1 and V2 are the same tactic with small changes not underdog or favourite.
broeckie84 Are you using OI's i could figure out what it was saying?
[Tactic] 4-1-2-3WB Full Att: tấn công và tấn công
But the results aren't mine, I just reposted the results from the author.
Last edited by dimartino; 17/02/2016 at 11:22 PM.
Well, tactic is VERY VERY attacking. I sincerely thought that it will be a lot worse defensively. And it kinda was at the start, but got better with time. Also, tactic still isn't fully fluid and my WBs are kinda bad... So, I'm really looking forward to the next season with better suited team for this tactic.
Last edited by ManUnited20; 18/02/2016 at 12:56 AM.
Anyone used strikerless.com 4-4-2?
Strikerless' Heresy - FM Central
i now but i try all the tactic on this forum almost just not in this tread, noyhing work for me good since the 4-4-2 scholes cant tackle, i dont understand because i do exatly like the others. i try to make my own it works for 20 games and then stop working 14-5-1 win/draw/lose, its ridicilous!
Last edited by ManUnited20; 18/02/2016 at 01:29 PM.
This looks like a proper representation of [Tactic] 4-1-2-3WB Full Att: tấn công và tấn công:
![]()